Delhi Couple Ends 5-Year Divorce Fight After Emotional Courtroom Reunion A five-year divorce battle between a Delhi couple came to an unexpected end after an emotional moment inside a courtroom turned a hearing for separation into a reunion. According to reports, Shikha and Saurabh had been involved in a long legal fight after their marriage, which began in 2020, ran into dispute

Ravi Mohan Interim Maintenance Case: Madras HC Keeps Deadline The Madras High Court has dismissed actor Ravi Mohan’s petition seeking more time in the interim maintenance case filed by his estranged wife, Aarti Ravi. With this order, the Family Welfare Court in Chennai is expected to hear the maintenance plea within the deadline already fixed by the High Court. The development has brought f

Asaram Bapu Life Sentence Upheld In POCSO Case   Asaram Bapu Life Sentence Upheld The Rajasthan High Court has upheld the life sentence given to Asaram Bapu in the 2013 minor rape case. The Jodhpur bench dismissed his appeal against the 2018 trial court order and said the charges of rape, sexual assault under the POCSO Act and offences under the Juvenile Justice Act were pr

FAIMA Moves Supreme Court Seeking NTA Reforms After NEET-UG 2026 Cancellation The Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) has approached the Supreme Court seeking major reforms in the functioning of the National Testing Agency (NTA) following the cancellation of NEET-UG 2026 over alleged paper leak concerns. The petition urged the Centre to either replace or restructure the NTA, which conducts several national-level entrance examination

Bombay High Court Clears ‘Raja Shivaji’ Release, Dismisses PIL Over Film Title Row   The Bombay High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking to stall the release of the film Raja Shivaji, clearing the way for its theatrical debut on May 1, 2026. The petition challenged the film’s title, objecting to the omission of the honorific “Chhatrapati” before Shivaji Maharaj’s name. A bench comprising Chief Justice Shree

In a significant ruling for the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK), a civil court in Chennai has refused to freeze the party’s 'mango' symbol, which has been at the center of a family dispute within the party. The decision, which comes ahead of Tamil Nadu’s upcoming assembly elections, is seen as a win for Anbumani Ramadoss, the son of PMK founder Dr. Ramadoss, as it clears the path for his faction to use the symbol in the elections. Dr. Ramadoss had sought the court's intervention, ar

In a significant legal development, Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia have been discharged from the controversial Delhi excise policy case. A Delhi court ruled that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had failed to present substantial evidence to support the serious charges against the two leaders, effectively clearing them of the allegations. The court's decision highlighted the absence of material evidence to support the claim that Kejriwal played a central role in the alleged corruption surrounding the excise policy. The judge emphasized that such serious accusations, especially involving a prominent figure like the Chief Minister, required solid, verifiable evidence. Without this, the prosecution's claims could not be sustained. The court further noted that accepting unproven allegations could erode public trust in the office of the Chief Minister and in the political process as a whole. Manish Sisodia was also discharged by the court, which found that the prosecution's case did not hold up under judicial scrutiny. There was no evidence suggesting criminal intent on his part. The documents and statements related to the formulation of the excise policy were primarily administrative in nature and did not point to corruption or wrongdoing, weakening the prosecution's narrative. The prosecution’s conspiracy theory, which alleged an overarching plot involving both Kejriwal and Sisodia, was found to be lacking. The court identified internal contradictions within the claims and concluded that the policy formulation process had involved consultations at various government levels and institutional deliberations, none of which indicated illicit activity. This breakdown further undermined the prosecution's case. The court's ruling marks a major setback for the prosecution, underscoring the challenges in proving political and administrative corruption cases when key allegations lack corroborated evidence. The acquittals of Kejriwal and Sisodia raise questions about the strength of charges against political figures and the use of public office in such investigations. For Arvind Kejriwal, the discharge clears his name in this high-profile case, which has attracted significant attention from both political observers and the public. Kejriwal has long argued that the case against him was politically motivated, aimed at damaging the Aam Aadmi Party’s (AAP) image ahead of elections. This ruling could prove to be a pivotal moment in his political career, potentially strengthening his position as a leader who has been unjustly targeted.

In a major legal setback for actor Vijay, the Madras High Court has upheld the Rs 1.5 crore tax penalty imposed by the Income Tax Department, dismissing his appeal against the levy. The penalty stems from alleged non-disclosure of additional income earned from his 2015 film Puli. During tax searches in 2015, the department discovered that nearly Rs 5 crore of Vijay's Rs 15 crore remuneration was paid in cash and not reported in his tax returns, leading to the penalty. Vijay